Legal Opinion

State v. Patton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1995No. C-940871PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Presiding Judge.

The defendant-appellant, Daryl Patton, appeals from the conviction entered upon the jury’s verdict finding him guilty of having a weapon under disability in violation of R.C. 2923.13 and of the accompanying firearm and causing-physical-harm specifications. In his two assignments of error, which address only the physical-harm specification to the weapon-under-disability count, he contends that (1) the trial court committed prejudicial error by refusing to instruct the jury on self-defense with regard to the physical-harm specification, and (2) the guilty verdict as to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. WillifordOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. KossOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HardyOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. GilcreaseOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API