Legal Opinion
White Horse v. Heckler
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided October 25, 1985No. Civ. 85-3006PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASE SUMMARY
DONALD J. PORTER, Chief Judge.
Named plaintiffs are residents of the State of South Dakota who receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). 42 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq. They bring this action as representative members of a class comprised of all South Dakota households that have had their AFDC grants terminated, decreased, or have been denied AFDC benefits as a result of state and federal regulations promulgated under Section 2640 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-369, 98 Stat. 494, 1145 (to be codified as amendments to 42 U.S.C. §§ 602(a) and 657(b)).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ardister v. MansourDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
- Gorrie v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Showers Ex Rel. Colon v. CohenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Gibson v. SalleeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1986
- Elam v. BarryDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.