Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 1992No. C90-06-33381 CA A67111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*530RIGGS, J.

Defendant was convicted of robbery in the second degree. ORS 164.405. He challenges both his conviction and the sentence. We write only to address the sentencing issue and affirm.

A store security guard saw defendant take several items and conceal them on his person. When defendant left the store without paying for them, the security guard followed him to the parking lot, identified himself and demanded the items back. When defendant returned only one of them, the security guard demanded the remaining items. Defendant began to walk away; the security guard grabbed him by the arm.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. GideonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. State v. PetrieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API