Legal Opinion

State v. Newman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 1992No. CR90-367; CA A67884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant pled guilty to two counts of sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.405, in exchange for the dismissal of five other counts of sodomy in the first degree. He appeals from the upward departure sentence on one count. We affirm.

Defendant’s main argument is that the departure is not supported by substantial and compelling reasons, because the sentencing court considered the age of the victim, Michael, as an aggravating factor. OAR 253-08-002(l)(b)(B).1 He argues that age could not be considered, because the victim’s youth was a necessary element of the crime of sodomy in the first degree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Orsi/GauthierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API