Commonwealth v. Green
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jacobs, J.,
The issue in this case is whether a demurrer was properly sustained on a bill of indictment charging the defendant, Joseph Green, with the crime of rape.
On December 30, 1966, the defendant pleaded not guilty and waived a jury trial on three bills of indictment charging rape, sodomy, and carrying a concealed deadly weapon. At the close of the Commonwealth’s case, the Hon. Juanita Kidd Stout sustained a demurrer on the bill charging rape. 1 The Commonwealth has appealed. We must reverse.
A lower court order sustaining a demurrer to the Commonwealth's evidence in a criminal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BowesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Commonwealth v. WheelerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. DeyellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. WydoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. McDadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ZeringoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. CreiderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MasonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. BeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.