Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Green

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1967No. Appeal, 259PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

The issue in this case is whether a demurrer was properly sustained on a bill of indictment charging the defendant, Joseph Green, with the crime of rape.

On December 30, 1966, the defendant pleaded not guilty and waived a jury trial on three bills of indictment charging rape, sodomy, and carrying a concealed deadly weapon. At the close of the Commonwealth’s case, the Hon. Juanita Kidd Stout sustained a demurrer on the bill charging rape. 1 The Commonwealth has appealed. We must reverse.

A lower court order sustaining a demurrer to the Commonwealth's evidence in a criminal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BowesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Commonwealth v. WheelerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. DeyellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Commonwealth v. WydoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. McDadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZeringoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Commonwealth v. CreiderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. MasonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. BeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API