Legal Opinion

Ross v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 2014No. Case No. CIV-10-1354-RPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment, filed by the parties after the Court granted leave to address certain limited issues. Having considered Plaintiffs motion (Doc. No. 170) and Defendant Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (“BNSF”)’s motion (Doc. No. 171), as well as the corresponding responses and replies, the Court finds as follows.

The facts underlying the dispute are well known to the parties and won’t be repeated herein. The instant motions address whether the crossing at issue was public or private, a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pierce County v. GuillenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued on June 9 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. in Re Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API