Legal Opinion
Town of Schroeppel v. Spector
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Cardamone, J.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff, Town of Schroeppel, Oswego County, New York, to enjoin the defendants from continuing a nonconforming use in violation of the Zoning Ordinance of the said town. As an affirmative defense, the defendants asserted that the Zoning Ordinance adopted by the Town of Schroeppel on December 11, 1952 is unconstitutional and void, on the grounds that its enactment did not meet the requirements of section 264 of the Town Law. The defendants further asserted that any nonconforming use of their land was in existence prior to the enactment of the Zoning…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Merritt v. . Village of PortchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- People Ex Rel. Ortenberg v. BalesNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- People ex rel. Ortenberg v. BalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lone v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Town of Preble v. Song Mountain, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Coutant v. Town of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Sullivan v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Northern Operating Corp. v. Town of RamapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.