Legal Opinion

State v. Pickens

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 23, 2009No. 2008AP1514-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundsten, J.

¶ 1. Sameeh Pickens was detained outside a hotel because the police suspected that he and others were involved in illegal drug activity at the hotel. The police obtained incriminating evidence from Pick-ens and from a hotel room in which Pickens was apparently staying. Pickens moved to suppress this evidence, arguing that his detention was illegal and that the evidence was obtained as a result of the illegal detention. The circuit court disagreed and denied the motion. Pickens entered pleas and was convicted of two counts of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver as party to a crime. On…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Dean M. BlattermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  3. State v. BurrowsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
  5. State v. RissleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API