State v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtStark, J.
¶ 1. Mastella Jackson made inculpatory statements to police while in custody, both before *559and after receiving Miranda1 warnings. Some of her statements were included in an affidavit used to obtain a warrant to search her home. Then, while the search was underway, Jackson was brought to the home and told police where to find certain physical evidence. The circuit court subsequently granted Jackson's motion to suppress her statements to police, as well as the physical evidence obtained during the search of her home.
¶ 2. On appeal, it is undisputed that Jackson's statements were properly…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Mastella L. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Mastella L. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Mastella L. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016