Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dept. of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 2019No. A163599PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

299 Submitted June 1, 2018, petition for judicial review dismissed December 11, 2019 ARLEN PORTER SMITH, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. Department of Corrections A163599

456 P3d 310

Petitioner seeks judicial review under ORS 183.400 of the Oregon Department of Corrections’ (DOC) Commissary Operations Policy. He argues that the policy is a disguised administrative rule and is thus invalid because the DOC adopted it without following proper rulemaking procedures. ORS 183.400(4)(c). Held: The Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction over petitioner’s challenge because petitioner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sweere v. CrookhamOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Smith v. Two Rivers Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Smith v. Department of Consumer & Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Smith v. Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Lewis v. Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API