Legal Opinion
Rodger v. Bliss
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBippey, J.
Six causes of action on contract are set up in the complaint and plaintiff has duly moved to strike out the answer and for a summary judgment under rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice.
If plaintiff is to succeed upon such an application it must appear from an examination of all the papers presented (1) that the action is one to recover a debt or liquidated demand arising either upon contract express or implied or upon a judgment for a stated sum: *169and (2) that the defense or denial interposed is sham or frivolous. (General Investment Co. v. Interborough R. T. Co., 235 N. Y. 133; Hanna v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Conkling v. . WeatherwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Hanna v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Burckle v. . EckhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Thomas P. WuenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Munro v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Security Finance Co. v. StuartNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Hespe v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Cogswell v. CogswellNew York Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.