Legal Opinion
Munro v. United States
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 11, 1935No. 1111-APublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPEY, District Judge.
This is an action brought on a policy of War Risk Insurance. Plaintiff is a resident of the Western District of New York; thus the suit is brought in the right district. Congress has conferred jurisdiction on this court over the subject-matter of the action. 38 USCA § 445. Thus, the jurisdiction of this court is exclusive. United States v. Pfitsch, 256 U. S. 547, 552, 41 S. Ct. 569, 65 L. Ed. 1084.
Section 445 of title 38 USCA also provides that “The procedure in such suits shall be the same as that provided in sections 762 and 763 of Title 28, and section 765 of Title…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. HvoslefSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. PfitschSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- MacKay v. Uinta Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. New York & O. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Munro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Genesee Valley Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- United States v. Various Articles of Personal Property Seized at Premises of NobleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.