Legal Opinion

Succession of Peytavin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1845PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Probates of Ascension, Duffel, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

In the account of tbe exeputors, filed on the 9th May, 1837, Mrs. Bernard was placed as a creditor for five thousand five hundred dollars, subject to a deduction of fifteen hundred dollars, paid in 1834. Sbe made no opposition, and tbe executors were authorized to make payment accordingly. In 1843, at tbe suit of the legatees, the executors filed an account of the monies in their hands after the payment authorized in 1837, and Mrs. Bernard was placed as a creditor for an additional sum of sixteen hundred and twenty-eigbt dollars and nineteen cents, claimed as omitted through error in the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Succession of SpykerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Conery v. His CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Elston, Prince & McDade, Inc. v. First State Bank of Plain DealingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Succession of de EganaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866
  5. In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API