Legal Opinion

Succession of de Egana

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a re-hearing.

1Opinion of the CourtInsiiEY, J.

In this case a re-hearing is prayed for in behalf of the Canal Bank and other appellants. Their counsel, before urging the grounds upon which, in his opinion, the motion to dismiss was improperly sustained by this Court, has gone at some length, 'and with his usual ability, into the merits of the case; but, as we said in the judgment, the reconsideration of which is now solicited, it is not our province, at this stage of the proceedings, to examine into the merits of the case. Our task is simply to determine whether, by their voluntary acts in executing or ratifying the execution of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Succession of PeytavinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Egan v. Hotel Grunewald Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Succession of SpykerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. Succession of MarcourLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Corbitt v. HansonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API