Legal Opinion

Linton v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided February 14, 2008No. 13-05-00668-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice VALDEZ.

Appellant, Audrey Linton, appeals from her conviction for driving while intoxicated. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 49.04 (Vernon 2006). She asserts, inter alia, that the trial court erred in not making proper accommodations for her hearing impairment. 1 Specifically, Linton contends that in failing to make proper accommodations, the trial court violated section 38.31 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and denied her the right to confront and cross- examine witnesses, pursuant to both the United States and Texas Constitutions. U.S. Const, amends. VI and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  2. Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  3. Adams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Brazell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Audrey Rochelle Linton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  4. Audrey Rochelle Linton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API