Legal Opinion

Brazell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1992No. 3-90-169-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice (Retired).

After finding the appellant guilty of forgery, Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 32.21 (1989), the jury assessed punishment, enhanced by prior felony convictions, at sixty years.

Appellant asserts three points of error. In his first point of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in depriving him of his right under the United States Constitution and the Texas Constitution to confront witnesses and participate fully in his defense at trial. The failure of the court to affirmatively establish that “appellant’s enhancement plea of true was voluntarily and intelligently made”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Joseph Ferrell v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Adams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  5. Crowder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Lincoln v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Linton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  4. People v. JamesColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Anthony Darnell Walton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API