Legal Opinion
Van Horn Construct'n Corp. v. Joy Et Ux.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1949PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
This is a suit for specific performance in which plaintiff, Van Horn Construction Corporation, seeks to require defendants, Brady S. Joy and Dorothy M. Joy, his wife, to convey to it a tract of land 168 by 170 feet upon the payment of the agreed purchase price, or, in the alternative, a parcel of land 134 by 160 feet (being Lots 23 and 24, Portview Tracts) for the price of $1,689.08, which is 75.07% of the agreed price of the larger tract of land.
The complaint is in the usual form of a suit of this kind. Attached to and made a part of it, as an exhibit, is a copy of the earnest money receipt.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCourt v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Wetherby v. GriswoldOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Mansfield v. ShermanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1889
- Hughes v. HadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Hostetter v. MerrickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
3Cited by15 opinions
- Caveny v. ASHEIMOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Wittick v. MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Walker v. MACKEYOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Bausch v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.