Legal Opinion

Weeks v. Reliance Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 19, 1917No. 8209PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Complaint; from Colquitt superior court—Judge Thomas. May 8, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. Under the settled and fundamental policy of our law as embodied in section 4863 of the Civil Code of 1910, it is reversible error for the trial judge to express or to intimate his opinion as to what has or has not been proved; but the court may properly propound questions to a witness with a view to eliciting the truth of the case, especially where the purpose of such interrogation is to render definite the meaning of testimony otherwise vague, provided that in so doing no expression or impression is given of any opinion held by the judge as to what has been proved, or- as to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. HeathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. American Trust & Banking Co. v. BooneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Johnson v. Leffler Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Field & Adams v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Finch v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Waddy v. GrimesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  3. Summer v. BoydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. Akin v. AkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Stanfield v. HurseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API