Legal Opinion

Summer v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1951No. 17498PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The first amended ground of the motion for new trial excepts to the refusal to charge a timely written request as follows: “One is insane who has not strength of mind and reason equal to a clear and full understanding of the nature and consequences of his act in making a deed. One who has not strength of mind and reason equal to a clear and full understanding of his act in making a contract is in the eyes of the law one who is afflicted with an entire loss of understanding.” It is the indisputable right of a litigant to have given in the charge a pertinent legal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. DeNieff v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Frizzell v. ReedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Maddox v. Simmons & GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  4. Barlow v. StrangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Dicken v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Leggett v. BrewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jackson Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Vaughan v. VaughanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Kesler v. KeslerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  5. Randall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API