Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Richard G. Costello

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1958No. 752_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Costello is a state prisoner who seeks to prosecute his appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding in forma pauperis. Judge Yankwich refused to grant the certificate of probable cause and privilege of prosecuting the appeal in forma pauperis, stating that the appeal was without merit.

The question sought to be presented in the appeal concerns the validity of action taken under California law dealing with the redetermination of sentence under the indeterminate sentence statutes. Petitioner was originally sentenced to a term of from one to fourteen years, and the Adult Authority later set his term at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. In Re LarsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re CowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ahssem Rifai v. United States Parole Commission and Warden, United States Penitentiary, McNeil Island, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Frank Sturm v. California Adult Authority, Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden of San Quentin State Prison, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Michael L. Love v. C. J. Fitzharris, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, and the People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. In Re McLainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Amos Marshall Arketa v. Lawrence E. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API