Legal Opinion
Lancaster v. Mebane
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 7, 1924No. 2854. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The court charged the jury as follows:
“This cause will be submitted to you upon one fact alone, as follows: What amount of money will fairly and reasonably compensate the plaintiff as damages for the mental anguish suffered by him by reason of the negligent delay in the shipment of his mother’s remains from El Paso to De Kalb? Answer in dollars and cents. [Here follows definition of mental anguish.]”
The appellants complain of submitting to the jury the question of damages only. They predicate error upon the ground that negligence vel non, as alleged in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hale v. Bonner and Eddy, ReceiversTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Lancaster v. MebaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lancaster v. MebaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932