Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Woodard
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
It is not doubted that the rule obtains in this state, as is clearly stated in the majority opinion, that in cases of the merely negligent act of the defendant mental suffering is not recognized as an element of damage where there has been no physical injury. Gulf, C. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Trott, 86 Tex. 412, 25 S.W. 419, 40 Am.St.Rep. 866, and other cases. But the rule is otherwise in certain cases such as where there is negligent infraction of a contractual obligation, or where there is affirmative or active negligence attended with circumstances of indignity. Hale v. Bonner, 82 Tex. 33, 17 S.W.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TrottTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Hale v. Bonner and Eddy, ReceiversTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. HoldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Austro-American S. S. Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. AnchondaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.