Legal Opinion
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 4, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-0162PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
On April 14, 1993, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion (“Mem.” or “April 14 Opinion”) holding that, as a matter of law, the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”) does not protect the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) from liability for actual direct compensatory damages caused by repudiation of a non-compete provision. In that Opinion, the Court “found that the non-compete provision could have value prior to repudiation and that the FDIC could be held…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension v. Pittston Company, United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. Rawl Sales & Processing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Ronald Dale Payne v. Security Savings & Loan Association, F.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. Pittston Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Kurt Schoen, T/a Don Pallini Dance Studios v. The Washington Post, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Childers v. SlaterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Keystone Tobacco Co. v. United States Tobacco Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Lewis v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Universal Studios Inc. v. Viacom Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1997
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.