Legal Opinion · Dissent

Black & Veatch Corporation v. Aspen Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 13, 2018No. 16-3359Published

1DissentBriscoe , Circuit Judge

I

I respectfully dissent because I believe New York law forecloses insurance coverage for damage to the work product of an insured, which is precisely the type of damage at issue here. Therefore, because I agree with the district court's conclusion that "New York law's governing definition of 'occurrence' does not recognize liability *972coverage" in this instance, D. Ct. Order at 56, I would affirm the district court.

The rule among intermediate appellate courts in New York has been that a CGL policy that includes a standard definition of "occurrence":

does not insure against faulty workmanship in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Colony Insurance Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Elkins v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bird v. West Valley CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API