Legal Opinion

McCord v. Sprinkel

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1912No. 2176Published

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Third District, in an appeal from Milam County. For the previous history of this case see: Nabours v. McCord, 36 Texas Civ. App., 504, 75 S. W., 827, 82 S. W., 153, 193, 661; McCord v. Nabours, 97 Texas, 271; Nabours v. McCord, 97 Texas, 527; Nabours v. McCord, 100 Texas, 456; Nabours v. McCord, 103 S. W., 469; McCord v. Nabours, 101 Texas, 494; Sprinkel v. McCord, 129 S. W., 379.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brown

The writ of error was granted because the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals practically settled this case. The litigation began prior to 1901 and grew out of a deed of assignment made by Crawford & Crawford on March 16, 1896, whereby they conveyed to A. P. McCord and T. S. Henderson the property described therein as assignees, to hold and administer for the benefit of the creditors of Crawford & Crawford. McCord and Henderson qualified under the statute, took possession of the property of the estate and proceeded *153with the execution of the trust. The creditors involved in this litigation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCord v. W.A. NaboursTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Nix & Storey v. DukesTexas Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API