Legal Opinion
In re C.K.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 15, 1995No. Nos. 94-508 & 95-381PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
This is a consolidated appeal from a Franklin Family Court CHINS merits order finding C.K. to be a child in need of supervision (CHINS),* and an order terminating parental rights. First, the appellant-father appeals the CHINS finding, arguing that (1) the trial court improperly admitted hearsay testimony under V.R.E. 804a(a)(3), (2) the court violated his right to confront witnesses by excluding him from the courtroom as the child testified, and (3) the court improperly admitted and relied upon hearsay expert testimony to find that C.K. had been sexually abused. We affirm the merits…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. GallagherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- In re R.M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- In re B.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- State v. WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In re M.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. OscarsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In the Matter of Pamela AGNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Pamela R.D.G.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Schmitt v. LalancetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- In re A.M., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.