Legal Opinion

HOYLE v. CROZIER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 2024No. 2:22-cv-03049Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NICHOLAS AUSTIN HOYLE Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-3049 PATRICK A. CROZIER, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rufe, J. October 16, 2024 Plaintiff Nicholas Austin Hoyle filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) raising claims pro se against 11 named Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The claims arise from a police investigation that led to Hoyle’s arrest, prosecution, and conviction for third-degree murder and related charges in the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas.1 After screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API