Kranis v. Biederbeck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for negligence, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), dated March 19, 2010, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the infant, Ryan Biederbeck, did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
“Although ‘a causally-related emotional injury, alone or in combination with a physical injury, can constitute a serious injury’ ” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bovsun v. SanperiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Graziano v. CoolingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Krivit v. PitulaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rumford v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Haque v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rumford v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- A. W. v. PalaciosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Haque v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.