Legal Opinion

Haque v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 11, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants failed to adequately address the plaintiffs claim that as a result of the subject accident, he sustained certain psychological injuries constituting a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Krayn v Torella, 40 AD3d 588 [2007]; see generally Kranis v…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Krivit v. PitulaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Chapman v. CapocciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Kranis v. BiederbeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perez v. DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  2. Salcedo v. MTA-New York City Tr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API