Legal Opinion

Murray v. Ready

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 29, 1929No. 12,135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

• Esther F. Murray sued E. J. Beady to recover judgment on the latter’s promissory note, and to foreclose a deed of trust given to secure the payment of the note. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the complaint, and, the plaintiff electing to stand on her complaint, dismissed the action.

In the complaint the plaintiff prays specifically for a personal judgment for the amount due upon the note. Most of the objections that the defendant makes to the complaint go to the plaintiff’s right to foreclose. These objections need not be considered at this time, because, as the case must be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. First Nat. Bank of Denver v. WilderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. American Bonding Co. v. RudolphSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  4. Steeple v. Max Kuner Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flood v. City National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. Foothills Holding Corp. v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Maryland Trust Co. v. GregoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API