Legal Opinion

American Bonding Co. v. Rudolph

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1912No. 7599PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. Harry C. Rid-DEE, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Campbell

Action on a surety’s bond. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant is here with its writ of error. The plaintiff below, defendant in error here, brought his action in .the district court against the Denver and Colorado1 investment company to foreclose a mortgage on real estate given by the-latter to secure its promissory note to him. The findings were for plaintiff, and a decree of foreclosure entered. In the decree there was, in one clause,-, an ascertainment of the amount due plaintiff on the mortgage debt,' and another clause reads: “It is therefore ordered, adjudged and.decreed…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foothills Holding Corp. v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Murray v. ReadySupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API