State v. Saunders

CURLEY, PJ.

¶ 1. Forrest Andre Saunders appeals the judgment convicting him of one count of burglary, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.10(lm)(a) (2009-10).1 He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Saunders argues that at trial the prosecutor— contrary to Wis. Stat. § 971.23(8)(a), Wisconsin's notice of alibi statute — improperly commented on the fact that a man named Paul, at whose house Saunders claimed to be during the burglary, did not testify at trial. He also argues that the trial court erred in denying him an evidentiary hearing to determine whether one of the *163jurors…