Legal Opinion

State v. Zamora

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 14, 1990No. 64,129PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This criminal case concerns; (1) prosecutorial misconduct in closing argument; (2) limitation of voir dire examination; (3) multiplicity of rape charges; and (4) disposition of a motion for acquittal addressing a charge of aggravated kidnapping.

David F.B. Zamora appeals his convictions of one count of aggravated kidnapping (K.S.A. 21-3421) and three counts of rape (K.S.A. 21-3502).

*685We reverse because of prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument. We find no error in the trial court’s disposition of Zamora’s claims relating to voir dire,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. State v. HaislipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. State v. GarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. State v. DorseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. State v. Mustafa Abdulla Abu-IsbaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. State v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State of Iowa v. Scott Robert RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API