Legal Opinion
Creech v. Arave
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1991No. 86-3983PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on March 27, 1991, 928 F.2d 1481, is hereby amended as follows:
In 928 F.2d at 1487, the following is deleted: “Creech has not pointed to any evidence to support his claim. The only ‘evidence’ purported to buttress his claim of ineompetency contains no citations to the record.”
The following is inserted in lieu thereof: “Contrary to Creech’s assertion, Dr. Hey-rend did not conclude that Creech could not appreciate the consequences of decisions such as waiving legal rights. When asked, “Do you have any information or evidence to indicate to your satisfaction that at the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Ignacio Alberto ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. CardIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Von Clark Davis v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.