Legal Opinion

Wella Corp. v. California Concept Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 14, 1977No. Patent Appeal No. 77-503PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This appeal1 is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“board”), 192 USPQ 158 (1976), dismissing appellant’s opposition -No. 55,727, filed June 6, 1974, against application No. 454,056, filed April 20, 1973, for registration of the marr below for men’s cologne, men’s hair spray, men’s hair conditioner, and men’s hair shampoo,

and denying appellant’s petition for cancellation No. 10,369, filed June 13, 1973, of appellee’s trademark CALIFORNIA CONCEPT 2 for hair shampoo and men’s cosmetics. Appellant is the owner of the trademark CONCEPT for cold permanent wave…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Knickerbocker Toy Co. v. Faultless Starch Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. In re West Point-Pepperell, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. Application of Knapp-Monarch CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  5. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  2. Weiss Associates, Inc. v. Hrl Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. San Fernando Electric Mfg. Co. v. JFD Electronics Components Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  5. Squirtco v. Tomy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API