Legal Opinion
Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Abbott Laboratories
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 24, 2014No. Nos. 11-17357, 11-17373PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
A sua sponte call for a vote on rehearing this case en banc was made by an active judge of this court. The call failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-reeused active judges. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The sua sponte en banc call is rejected.
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, joined by BYBEE and BEA, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc:
This ease started out as an antitrust dispute between drug manufacturers and came to our court in the posture of an appeal from a simple juror selection ruling during trial. Sadly, it has morphed into a constitutional essay about…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Latta v. OtterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Maner v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Rolando v. FoxDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2014
- Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.