Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bishop v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 18, 2014No. 14-5003, 14-5006Published

1ConcurrenceHolmes, Circuit Judge

In upholding the district court’s substantive ruling in this case, the majority concludes that Oklahoma’s same-sex marriage ban — found in SQ 7111 — impermissibly contravenes the fundamental right to marry protected by the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Constitution. I fully agree with that conclusion and endorse without reservation the reasoning of the majority on this matter.2

I write here, however, to focus on one significant thing that the district court wisely did not do in rendering its substantive ruling on the same-sex marriage ban. Specifically, the district court…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API