Bishop v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1ConcurrenceHolmes, Circuit Judge
In upholding the district court’s substantive ruling in this case, the majority concludes that Oklahoma’s same-sex marriage ban — found in SQ 7111 — impermissibly contravenes the fundamental right to marry protected by the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Constitution. I fully agree with that conclusion and endorse without reservation the reasoning of the majority on this matter.2
I write here, however, to focus on one significant thing that the district court wisely did not do in rendering its substantive ruling on the same-sex marriage ban. Specifically, the district court…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.