Legal Opinion
Jones v. Montana Nineteenth Judicial District Court
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 2001No. 01-594PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*306OPINION AND ORDER
L FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶1 Before this Court is Attorney Russell K. Jones’s (Jones) Petition for Review or Supervisory Control and Motion for Stay. The Petition seeks review of an order by District Judge Michael C. Prezeau on February 8, 2001, holding Jones in contempt in connection with Jones’s representation of Debbie Lynch and Matthew Kyle in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, Cause No. DN-00-23 and Judge Prezeau’s subsequent denial of Jones’s motion to reconsider on March 1,2001. The Motion for Stay involves Jones being required to appear…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Park v. Montana Sixth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Grossman v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Joyce v. GarnaasMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Haugen v. Blaine Bank of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Lee v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schaefer v. EgelandMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Estate of Burrell v. Estate of BurrellMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Animal Foundation of Great Falls v. Montana Eighth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Christian v. Sixth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Jones v. Montana Nineteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2001