Legal Opinion

Eisenberg v. Peoples Republic of China

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 10, 2023No. 1:22-cv-10194Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS LEELAND EISENBERG, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-cv-10194-IT PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, THROUGH THE HON. YI WANG, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER February 10, 2023 TALWANI, D.J. On May 19, 2022, the court directed Plaintiff Leeland Eisenberg to show cause why this action ought not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Mem. & Order [Doc. No. 11]. Eisenberg, who is proceeding pro se, filed two responses to the court’s order, Pl.’s Mot. Show Cause Why Action Ought Not Be Dismissed (“Response to Show Cause”) [Doc. No. 21] and Pl.’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Saudi Arabia v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API