Legal Opinion

Sanchick v. State Board of Optometry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1955No. Docket 48, Calendar 46,463PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiff, a licensed optometrist, filed &. bill of complaint in the Ingham county circuit .court seeking to enjoin the defendant State board of .examiners in optometry from conducting a hearing •on a complaint charging plaintiff with unprofession.al, unethical and dishonest conduct.

Plaintiff’s bill of complaint challenged the sufficiency of the notice of hearing served upon him by the board and the constitutionality of the optometry .act (PA 1909, No 71, as amended). A temporary restraining order and an order to show cause issued upon the filing of the bill. The defendant board moved to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Abelson's, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of OptometristsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Bell v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Wayne County Board of Road Commissioners v. Wayne County ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Herald Co. v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. G C Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc v. Lofts on the Nine, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Preston v. SleziakMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API