First Nat. Bank of Tipton v. Carroll
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, G.
Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial. The tenth ground of the motion for new trial reads:
“The verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and is contrary to law.”
Under the view taken of the case here this assignment of error must be sustained. It is conceded that if there was a conversion it occurred March 8, 1921. This action was commenced November 26, 1921. The only proof offered as to the value of the cotton was proof of its market value during the latter part of September, 1921. Section…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Funk v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller v. Tidal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Hamco Oil and Drilling Company v. ErvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Kapsemalis v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940