Legal Opinion

People v. Oliver

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum : Prior to the passage of the new Criminal Procedure Law, it would have been proper for the Trial Judge, under certain circumstances, to deny a motion for a pretrial hearing to determine if pretrial photographic identification was improperly obtained (People v. Ganci, 27 N Y 2d 418, 427). The new Criminal Procedure Law, however, changes that rule and makes a requested pretrial hearing mandatory in a case such as the one at bar. (See CPL 710.20, subd. 5; 710.30, subd. 2; 710.40; see, also, People v. Harrington, 31 N Y 2d 785, 786.) It was therefore error to deny the motion for a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. FuentesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. SlaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. People v. WoodberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. People v. Smith, New York County Courts1980
  5. The People v. Thomas P. PerdueNew York Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API