Legal Opinion

S.M., etc. v. Florida Department of Children and Families

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 1, 2016No. SC15-2127PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPariente, J.

This case involves what is constitutionally required before terminating the parental rights to children. Recognizing that parents have a fundamental liberty interest in being a parent to their children, this Court has required that, as part of a parent’s constitutional rights, the termination of parental rights be the “least restrictive means” of protecting the child from harm. Padgett v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs., 577 So.2d 565, 571 (Fla.1991). The mother of three minor children, while conceding that the grounds for termination of parental rights had been met and that reunification…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Lehman Ex Rel. Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Services AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Padgett v. Dept. of Health & Rehab. ServicesSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Florida Dept. of Children and Fam. v. FlSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. M.L. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Guardian Ad Litem Program v. C.W. (In re X.W.)District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Guardian ad Litem Program ex rel. A.E. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. A.W. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. B.A. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API