Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Eugene Andrew Young & Claude Hutchinson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 2, 2017No. 45996-5-II; 46113-7-IIPublished

1Opinion of the CourtBjorgen, C.J.

¶1 Claude Hutchinson moves to modify our commissioner’s ruling awarding appellate costs to the State after we affirmed Hutchinson’s convictions. He argues (1) that his challenge to appellate costs is timely raised in a motion to modify the commissioner’s ruling even absent an objection to the cost bill and (2) that we should decline to impose appellate costs. Despite his failure to object to the cost bill, we hold that Hutchinson’s motion to modify the cost bill warrants consideration under RAP 1.2(c). We grant his motion to modify and refer the matter to our court commissioner to determine…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. State Of Washington v. Spencer D. GrantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API