Legal Opinion

School Directors of District No. Two v. Orr

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 16, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Assumpsit, for breach of contract. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Wayne County: the Hon. Enoch E. Newlin, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the August term, 1899.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Bigelow

delivered the opinion of the court.

From appellants’ statement of the case it appears that this suit was brought by, appellee against appellants for a breach of a contract by appellee with appellants to teach a five months term of school at $3o per month. Appellee claimed the contract was made April 19,1897, and the term of school was to commence October 4th of that year. At the time of the claimed date of the contract, appellee had no certificate of qualification as a teacher, nor did he secure one until about September 4th of that year, although he had been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Pekin v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. City of Flora v. NaneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pollard v. School Dist. No. 9Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  4. School Directors v. CrewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  5. City of Pekin v. McMahonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zeller v. Prior Lake Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Jones v. Stoneware Pipe Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  3. Missouri & Illinois Coal Co. v. ReichertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  4. Cramer v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  5. Hudson v. Yeomen of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API