Legal Opinion

Hart v. Johnston

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 4, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 6682Published

1Opinion of the Court

Neese, District Judge.*

This is an action on an alleged oral promise by the defendant’s decedent to pay the plaintiff a sum of money. While jurisdiction is not disputed by either party, this court is required to notice its jurisdiction on its own motion. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (1939), 298 U. S. 178, 184, 56 S. Ct. 780, 80 L. Ed. 1135, 1141(3).

This court has not acquired jurisdiction of this action to enforce payment to the plaintiff of the aforementioned sum of money unless there has been a timely presentation to and rejection by the defendant-administrator of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Short v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962
  3. Beacon Mutual Indemnity Co. v. StalderOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Benson, Admx. v. RosineOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Trustees of the Masonic Temple Ass'n v. EmmonsOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API