Legal Opinion

Mann v. Fredrickson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 30, 2006No. 20050955-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 Appellant Louise Mann claims that th trial court erred in denying her motion for a new trial based on both the insufficiency of the evidence and an erroneous jury instruction. We disagree and affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The parties were involved in an automobile accident, Mann's car being struck from behind by a furniture truck driven by defendant Samuel P. Fredrickson. As a result, Mann filed a negligence action against Fredrickson and his employer, Riddle Services, Inc.

¶ 3 After a five-day jury trial presided over by Judge Robert W. Adkins, the jury returned a verdict…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. CallihamUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Brigham Ex Rel. Brigham v. Moon Lake Electric Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Nelson v. TrujilloUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Maltby v. Cox Const. Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanpete America, LLC v. WillardsenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kranendonk v. Gregory & Swapp, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Schreib v. WhitmerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  4. Jessop v. HardmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API