Mann v. Fredrickson
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
¶ 1 Appellant Louise Mann claims that th trial court erred in denying her motion for a new trial based on both the insufficiency of the evidence and an erroneous jury instruction. We disagree and affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The parties were involved in an automobile accident, Mann's car being struck from behind by a furniture truck driven by defendant Samuel P. Fredrickson. As a result, Mann filed a negligence action against Fredrickson and his employer, Riddle Services, Inc.
¶ 3 After a five-day jury trial presided over by Judge Robert W. Adkins, the jury returned a verdict…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. CallihamUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Brigham Ex Rel. Brigham v. Moon Lake Electric Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Nelson v. TrujilloUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Maltby v. Cox Const. Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sanpete America, LLC v. WillardsenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Kranendonk v. Gregory & Swapp, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Schreib v. WhitmerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Jessop v. HardmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014