Legal Opinion

Hocker v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1912No. 2074PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, McClain County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by F. J. Carroll, for the use of the Union National Bank, against J. W. Hocker. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The defendant in error, for the use of the Union National Bank, as plaintiff, commenced an action in the mayor’s court of the incorporated town of Purcell, against the plaintiff in error, J. W. Plocker, as defendant, on September 5, 1901, to recover a certain iron gray mare.

Execution issued by me United States Commissioner for the Southern Judicial District or the Indian Territory, at Purcell, on a judgment on a contract, and the defendant sought to claim the mare as exempt. When the execution was placed in the hands of the constable for said district, said commissioner was absent on a 30-day…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. J. W. Ripey Son v. the Art Wall Paper MillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Haswell v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Binion v. LyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Sims v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Leiber, Justice of the Peace v. ArgaubrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Stuart State Bank v. WatersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Sullivan v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co. v. CristSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Williamson v. CornettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API