Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Cornett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 1924No. 14181PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action involves the question of error of the district court in sustaining a motion to dissolve on attachment ; the reason for dissolving same being the alleged grounds that the property attached was exempt from forced sale.

The plaintiff in error brought suit in the justice court against the defendant in error for $200, alleged to he due from defendant for the rent of a house, and obtained judgment for the $200, but in the meantime procured an order of attachment and attached certain household goods.

The defendant made no defense to the suit, but moved to dissolve the attachment on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sale, Sheriff v. ShippSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. In re BlanchardDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1907
  3. Hocker v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Parsons v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. McClelland v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zone Oil & Gas Co. v. Dudley & Heath Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API