Donovick v. Seattle-First National Bank
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentDore, J.
(dissenting) — I dissent.
The Bank made a mistake in drafting the documents for this loan which put it in a dilemma: holding two deeds of trust, neither of which fully secured its loan, it was limited to judicial foreclosure or was left undersecured if it were to attempt two nonjudicial foreclosures. Although it could have employed the more cumbersome method of judicial foreclosure, the Bank chose to run the risk of losing part of its security by attempting a nonjudicial foreclosure. I see no reason to rescue the Bank from its own folly when to do so *419violates the letter and spirit of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Felton v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Fourth Avenue SouthWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Straus v. Wilsonian Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Lessard v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1954